Description
Development opportunity.... Scenario 1: The CMX-2 property can be developed as (1) residential unit atop of ground floor commercial space. 80% coverage gets a building footprint of 16x33. The other properties are zoned for single family so they can support a similar 31-32 deep structure, used as single family.Scenario 2: If these are all one lot, then there is a split zoning scenario, whereas the most restrictive district (CMX-2 or RSA-5) controls the entire lot. So because RSA-5 would comprise at least 10% of the total lot area, the entire parcel defaults to RSA-5, single family. If you planned to do anything but single family, then youd have to get a zoning variance. Assuming you do an RM-1 style unit calculation, then youd be looking at a total of 9 residential units. The shallow depth of these lots would present an unconventional layout for a singular building, but again anything is possible.Scenario 3: A final option would be to combine these into larger single family lots, in which case each new lot would need to be at least 16 wide, and 960 s.f. minimum. So perhaps doing double wide lots with homes on them might make sense. Please consult your zoning attorning for further details.
-
0BEDS
-
0.09ACRES
-
0BATHS
-
01/2 BATHS
Description
Development opportunity.... Scenario 1: The CMX-2 property can be developed as (1) residential unit atop of ground floor commercial space. 80% coverage gets a building footprint of 16x33. The other properties are zoned for single family so they can support a similar 31-32 deep structure, used as single family.Scenario 2: If these are all one lot, then there is a split zoning scenario, whereas the most restrictive district (CMX-2 or RSA-5) controls the entire lot. So because RSA-5 would comprise at least 10% of the total lot area, the entire parcel defaults to RSA-5, single family. If you planned to do anything but single family, then youd have to get a zoning variance. Assuming you do an RM-1 style unit calculation, then youd be looking at a total of 9 residential units. The shallow depth of these lots would present an unconventional layout for a singular building, but again anything is possible.Scenario 3: A final option would be to combine these into larger single family lots, in which case each new lot would need to be at least 16 wide, and 960 s.f. minimum. So perhaps doing double wide lots with homes on them might make sense. Please consult your zoning attorning for further details.
©2024 Bright MLS, All Rights Reserved. IDX information is provided exclusively for consumers' personal, non-commercial use and may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing. Some properties which appear for sale may no longer be available because they are for instance, under contract, sold, or are no longer being offered for sale. Information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed accurate by the MLS or Benson and Mangold, LLC. Some real estate firms do not participate in IDX and their listings do not appear on this website. Some properties listed with participating firms do not appear on this website at the request of the seller. Data last updated: 2024-09-18T23:52:09.51.